Almost a month ago, I experienced a situation of violence on the part of the company where I worked, the SURT Foundation (Fundaci\u00f3n SURT). Before writing this text, I have spent much time thinking about the necessity and importance of making this act of violence public. After all, as many ex-colleagues of the Foundation say “It happens everywhere”, thus, from such understanding we could also say that many of the problems and injustices that we live day by day happen everywhere, then why talk about it if it is already normalized?<\/p>\n
I don\u2019t agree, nor it is my way of proceeding or being in this world; because as we feminists say, \u201cThe personal is political.\u201d Why should I remain silent and pretend as if nothing had happened? As has been the case for many years with professionals who have left this Foundation, having been subjected to mistreatment. The bad practices of the directives of this company are vox populi in the field of social intervention in Barcelona and are also known by people working in public administration.<\/p>\n
A Foundation that started and worked with good intentions, and with time, became part of the “Social Intervention Industry.\u201d A kind of multinational which presents itself to all the open calls it can, with the aim of “implanting their models of intervention\u201d that they call \u201cempowerment\u201d, and to venture into many social issues, because they believe that they know and can do everything. Reducing costs and loading more work on their employees.<\/p>\n
The reasons for my leave \u2013 non-renewal – were supposedly due to “the violence service that did not grow and a lack of money to pay me, and to maintain an organic structure”, unsustainable arguments because they had won an open call that I elaborated during one weekend, while I was told it would serve to give continuity to the team. Since the days after my leave they have begun the process of hiring more people, to work in organic structures, as they call them.<\/p>\n
The communication of this decision was violent and unexpected, I was the only person whose contract was not renewed. This fact, while being in itself violent and painful in its form and argued lies – although they try to minimize and relativize it as it is their practice, like the one of the abuser – leads me to the conclusion, in concordance with what ex-colleagues have said to me since I started to work there, that it is forbidden to question, to reclaim, – those who do so are left out. To argue my work, to question the verticality of certain practices such as counting on the free time of their workers, to question a model of intervention into violence, thought and imposed from above, a model that does not take into account the heterogeneity and different realities of the women.<\/p>\n
The text I write, I do it in an act of self-confidence, as an act of freedom, as Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui says, in coherence with my convictions and political commitment. For many years I have been working in the area of violence and what I have heard and seen in the aforementioned Foundation is nothing more than a patriarchal violence practiced against its workers, paradoxically one of the problems against which they claim to fight.<\/p>\n
Violence that makes me uneasy, that women workers talk quietly about what happens to them and silence themselves when they have the opportunity not to do so, to make it evident, trying not to disturb “the patriarchal order”, those silences in which everyone knows that something is happening but no one says anything, like the “family secrets”. This produces confusion and make me question, what price are they willing to pay to keep a job? Why it is so difficult to speak with one\u2019s own voice? Is it because they believe that the other colleagues will not support them? Or is this abuse so normalized for them, that after all, it is not so bad?<\/p>\n
And here comes another question in relation to the “empowerment\u201d they claim to achieve with their users-beneficiaries, women at risk of exclusion and many immigrant women. On the one hand, I ask: what is empowerment? – A word so manipulated and emptied of content? Can it empower or help to empower those who have difficulty making their voices heard where they have to? And the immigrant women, those who they try to relocate from sex work to other labour areas – problematic and unethical like Inditex – would these women and many others not have much to teach them, women who have developed capacities of resistance, struggle, courage, survival while putting their bodies every day in hostile and racist milieus? Who empowers whom? Who does the narration of whom? Under what criteria and perspectives are the stories of immigrant women seen and read? From their generic white gaze? Or their discourses on interculturality repeated without any debate or analysis? An interculturality in that the “diverse” are the “users-beneficiaries”, but with little institutional commitment to have professionals of other origins.<\/p>\n
On the other hand, the directives of the Foundation are “preaching” on issues such as conciliation of working life, uses of time, violence, etc. occupying spaces of representation where their voices are often legitimated socially and politically. Women who are part of that elite of white “directives”, with power in the field of social intervention.<\/p>\n
Surely what I say provokes, as it is easier and more acceptable to stay within the political correctness and shut up, as I was suggested by ex-colleagues, saying nothing because the doors can close for me by the power these people have. It is true that they are known and re-known (for the work done by their professionals), but as I said at the beginning, there are many people who know this other side of the Foundation.<\/p>\n
Many of the things I have written in this text, I have previously communicated to the people who work in the Foundation in a farewell letter. The same that was answered by several ex-colleagues sharing with me their unease and violence experienced – using this term – “congratulating me” for the courage and subscribing my words. As I have expressed to them, I put into words what happens, I don\u2019t think of myself as a heroine, I just try to act accordingly with my convictions.<\/p>\n
The perversity of this is that instead self-criticism and acknowledging their mistakes and practices, they redirect responsibility and the problem to whoever questions, reclaims, rebels or tries to denounce, and do not look from the side of those who hold power- that is, themselves. The story is constructed in a way that \u201cthe guilt will be, and always is yours – the workers\u2019.”<\/p>\n
In this construction of imaginaries, SURT is a feminist entity. False. That their workers are feminists does not make it the feminist entity, that it has a feminist discourse does not make it feminist, that it occupies spaces of representation and their voices are audible does not make them feminists. It is perverse that an entity with its discourse to work for women, directed by women and a staff composed mostly by women, in the end, acts as any capitalist, productivist and racist enterprise.<\/p>\n
And this what I share is not a problem exclusively of this entity and its workers, unfortunately it is a reality that is pervasive. And yes, it happens everywhere and in all kinds of companies, but we are talking about a sector that works with people. I do not know to what extent the different administrations can be accomplices of this, turning a blind eye, giving benefits to entities like SURT in which often what counts is the economic part – the bottom line of course – like a fish that bites its tail to reify its workers.<\/p>\n
It would be good, in addition to so much gender perspective demanded in the projects, to reclaim and value good internal practices, especially by those entities – companies that call themselves FEMINISTS, who believe that feminism or “empowerment” should be implemented, imported as a program of “evangelization” or “salvation” of women.<\/p>\n
And even if it happens in this area and in others, and all this is the reflection of our times, why not begin transforming ourselves, individually and collectively starting with the closest? The revolution is not only on the streets; the revolution is created from local spaces; and for this we must dismantle fear, leaving it where it belongs, aside.<\/p>\n
\u00darsula Santa Cruz Castillo
\nBarcelona, 17th of January, 2017<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
NOTICE BY THE TRANSFEMINIST ANTIRACIST ACTIVIST GROUP OF BARCELONA<\/span><\/p>\n To those who subscribe: we, a transfeminist antiracist activist group based in Barcelona, express our support to the colleague \u00darsula Santa Cruz. The SURT Foundation, like many other institutions in the Kingdom of Spain, benefits from the gender, race and class violence suffered by migrant women, using us as an object of study, commodity and exchange to carry out its white Eurocentric feminist practices. We know about these facts through several colleagues who have worked and\/or work in this space and tell us about the vertical practices that are lived there day by day.<\/p>\n We are thankful to \u00darsula for voicing this unease and making it public.<\/p>\n IF THEY TOUCH ONE, THEY TOUCH US ALL! Luc\u00eda Ega\u00f1a ADHERENCES<\/span><\/p>\n collective<\/span><\/p>\n Nomadas Insumisas de las excolonias personal<\/span><\/p>\n Lurdes Gurria Santiago \u00darsula Santa Cruz Castillo<\/p>\n Almost a month ago, I experienced a situation of violence on the part of the company where I worked, the SURT Foundation (Fundaci\u00f3n SURT). Before writing this text, I have spent much time thinking about the necessity and importance of making this act of violence public. After all, as many ex-colleagues of the Foundation say “It happens everywhere”, thus, from such understanding we could also say that many of the problems and injustices that we live day by day happen everywhere, then why talk about it if it is already normalized?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[9,3,4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2463"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2463"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2463\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4903,"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2463\/revisions\/4903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.damne.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nNO TO INSTITUTIONAL RACIST LABOR VIOLENCE!<\/p>\n
\nMar\u00eda Teresa Cocciarini
\nTjasa Kancler
\nLucrecia Masson
\nBeatriz Cantero Riveros
\nSalma Amziam
\nPaola Contreras Hern\u00e1ndez
\nFlorencia Brizuela Gonz\u00e1lez
\nDiana Mar\u00edn
\nAinhoa Nadia Douhaibi
\nMarcela Mezzatesta
\nDaniela Ortiz
\nMaritza Buitrago
\nKarla Pinto Lopes
\nMa. Alejandra Ferradas
\nDaniela Xaiet
\nAna G\u00f3mez
\nAm\u00e9rica S\u00e1ez
\nNatali Vania
\nKatu Huidobro
\nSabrina S\u00e1nchez
\nLinda Porn
\nMiriam Camara<\/p>\n
\nTrenza
\nLes Atak\u00e0s
\nAPROSEX
\nCasa Iberoamericana de la Mujer
\nAsociaci\u00f3n Q\u00e0tary Per\u00fa
\nAs Candongas do Quirombo
\nRebeldes sin Sombra
\nADIS
\nAssociaci\u00f3 per la igualtat i la Recerca
\nEspacio del Inmigrante
\nAssociaci\u00f3 d\u2019amics de RTV Clot i Camp de l\u2019Arpa
\nCentro Peruano de Barcelona<\/p>\n
\nGuillermo Romero
\nGerm\u00e1n Buena\u00f1o
\nJorge Varas
\nFlorencia Acebal Alarc\u00f3n
\nDora Arana Jaimes
\nMarta Mas
\nDennis Perinango
\nMaite Marin
\nSilvia Carrizo
\nYsabel Guzm\u00e1n
\nAmaia Arketa
\nEmilia Matilla
\nLeticia Cruz
\nSonia Herrera
\nBlanca Almendariz
\nMiriam Benhsain
\nRosanna Fibla
\nEva Flores
\nJanet M\u00e9rida
\nMontse Martinez
\nElizabeth Maldonado
\nMariana Huidobro
\nCynthia Zurita
\nMarina Gr\u017eini\u0107
\nEsther Diez
\nCarolina Astudillo
\nLuc\u00eda Solavagione
\nCarolina Romeu
\nCarmen P\u00e9rez
\nEnrique G\u00f3ngora
\nLola Badenes
\nJudith Robinia
\nSalom\u00e9 Carvajal
\nLupe Garc\u00eda
\nMiriam Vega
\nBrigitte Vasallo
\nV\u00edctor Pool
\nYuderkys Espinosa
\nMartina Bernabai
\nBombo N\u2019dir
\nGladys Chafloque
\nElena Sala
\nElena Menacho
\nMa. Virginia Gonz\u00e1lez
\nJos\u00e9 Iglesias
\nKira Berm\u00fadez
\nPilar Murteira
\nElena Garnelo
\nEdgardo Guerra
\nSilvia MN
\nYosjuan Pinha
\nKyla Danaerys
\nIsmael Fanlo
\nCelenis Rodriguez
\nJaviera Cubillos
\nVanesa S\u00e1ez
\nDuen Sacchi
\nCaty Galaz
\nAnnie Gayda
\nLola Ferr\u00e9
\nSandra Y\u00e1\u00f1ez
\nCharo Guti\u00e9rrez
\nSirin Adbli Sibai
\nMontse Reyes
\nDiana Yunyent
\nBranka Vujanovi\u0107
\nPau Artigas
\nRegina Arquimbau
\nIsabel Giralt
\nIv\u00e1n Blas
\nNatalia Martin
\nJanette Vallejo
\nGaby Poblet
\nMerc\u00e8 Ventura
\nPedro D\u00edaz
\nLuciana Alfaro
\nMegan Michalak
\nJoana Termes Madrenas
\nMarina S\u00e1nchez Cid
\nMustafa Asrih
\nRaquel Rei Branco
\nIsaura Barciela Varela
\nRaquel Marques
\nFernanda Gonz\u00e1lez Briones
\nNerea V\u00e1zquez Lameiro
\nRegly S\u00e1nchez
\nMaria Perez Millan
\nMar\u00eda Rosendo Priego
\nRosa Santorum Paz
\nEzequiel Gallo
\nMariano Panzano
\nCarlos L\u00f3pez Tapia
\nRaquel Fern\u00e1ndez Souto
\nMarta Castro Zaera
\n\u00c1ngela Fraga Mar\u00eda
\nJana Cort\u00e9s
\nAlexandra V\u00e1sques Rei
\nEnrique G\u00f3ngora Padilla
\nDavid Mateo Casado<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"